AI in action 4: Supporting service teams through the Service Standard technology decisions

AI in action 4: Supporting service teams through the Service Standard technology decisions by Matt Hobbs

In this final article of our AI in action series, we turn our attention to the technological foundations that underpin modern government services and consider how these foundations must evolve to meet emerging opportunities and challenges.

Throughout this series, we have explored each of the 14 points of the government Service Standard to examine how artificial intelligence (AI) can support service teams and shape the future of public services.  If you’re joining partway through, you may want to read the introduction, which outlines how AI can support government service delivery and sets the context for this discussion. We then explored Service Standard points 1 to 5, focusing on user needs, accessibility, and joined-up experiences, followed by points 6 to 10, which examined how AI can support multidisciplinary teams, agile working, continuous improvement, and secure delivery.

Now, we’ll explore points 11 to 14 of the Service Standard - areas that are less about interfaces and workflows, and more about the underlying systems, infrastructure, and culture that enable services to be sustainable, open, and resilient.

Standards 11–14 include choosing the right tools and technology, making new source code open, using open standards, and operating a reliable service may not always be visible to the public. However, these principles are what ensure that digital services are trustworthy, cost-effective, and fit for the long term.

AI can now assist with everything from technology selection and licensing, to automated testing and deployment, to maintaining live services in real-time. And as AI tooling becomes more sophisticated, it’s increasingly capable of helping teams uphold these standards not just at launch, but throughout the service lifecycle.

Let’s explore how AI is supporting these back-end foundations, and where future innovation might unlock even more potential for collaboration, openness, and reliability across government.

Point 11. Choose the right tools and technology

Service Standard summary: Point 11 of the GOV.UK Service Standard advises teams to choose tools and technologies that support building high-quality, cost-effective services while staying adaptable for the future. It emphasises using automation, making smart build-or-buy decisions, leveraging common platforms, avoiding vendor lock-in through open standards, and managing legacy systems effectively.

Existing AI tooling:

• AI-Powered Code Analysis Tools: Tools like GitHub Copilot, SonarQube, or DeepCode assist in reviewing code quality, suggesting improvements, and flagging technical debt early, helping teams choose better implementation paths.

• Automated Cloud Cost Optimisers: Services like AWS Cost Explorer with AI-powered recommendations help optimise infrastructure choices, right-size services, and avoid over provisioning.

• Chatbots for Vendor Research: AI chat interfaces help teams quickly compare tools, read documentation, and analyse trade-offs between technologies or vendors.

• AI-Driven Testing and Monitoring: Tools like Testim or Mabl automate and enhance test coverage using AI, which ensures that the chosen tech stack is reliable and scalable.

• Natural Language to Query/Data Tools: Tools like OpenAI’s Codex or Microsoft Copilot allow non-technical users to interrogate systems or suggest tools via plain language, democratising decision-making on tools.

Future AI innovations:

• AI Architects / Decision Advisors: Smart assistants that could suggest entire architecture stacks based on your business context, team skill level, and legacy dependencies.

• Predictive Tech Debt Modelling: Tools that could forecast the long-term implications (cost, maintainability) of tech choices using historical data and project-specific inputs.

• Autonomous Procurement Bots: AI systems that could handle early-stage vendor outreach, price negotiation, and integration feasibility analysis to streamline procurement.

• Context-Aware Build-vs-Buy Recommenders: AI that could analyse organisational data, time constraints, and cost to recommend the best mix of bespoke development vs. off-the-shelf tools.

• Self-Adaptive Infrastructure Planning: AI systems that could not only recommend, but automatically adapt and refactor infrastructure as service needs evolve or usage spikes.

Point 12. Make new source code open

Service Standard summary: "Make new source code open", advises that all new government service source code should be openly accessible and reusable under appropriate licences to promote transparency, reduce duplication, and lower costs. Teams are encouraged to develop code publicly from the outset, ensuring sensitive information is excluded, and retain intellectual property rights to facilitate reuse. Exceptions will apply for code tied to unannounced sensitive policies.

Existing AI tooling:

• Automated Code Review for Sensitive Data: Tools like GitHub Copilot and DeepCode can flag hardcoded secrets, credentials, or personal data before code goes public.

• AI-Powered Documentation Generation: Tools like Mintlify, Tabnine, or even ChatGPT can generate clear, developer-friendly documentation to make open-source code easier to understand and reuse.

• Open-Source Licence Selection Support: AI chatbots and tools can guide developers in choosing appropriate open-source licences (e.g., MIT vs GPL), making compliance simpler.

• Code Quality and Security Scanning: AI-enhanced tools like Snyk or SonarQube help ensure open code is clean, consistent, and secure before being published.

• Automated Issue Triage: NLP models can help maintainers tag and sort GitHub issues or pull requests, speeding up community collaboration.

Future AI innovations:

• Autonomous Redaction Bots: AI agents could scan and redact sensitive data, environment variables, or internal logic automatically before code is pushed to a public repo.

• Intelligent Open-Source Readiness Advisors: AI tools could assess a private codebase’s readiness for open sourcing, providing a checklist or roadmap for teams to completely open-source their service code.

• Adaptive Licensing Engines: AI could analyse dependencies and business goals to suggest or automatically apply the most appropriate open-source licence dynamically.

• Multi-language Documentation Bots: Future AI could generate documentation in multiple languages to expand accessibility and global reuse of government code.

• AI Legal Assistants: AI tools could review legal implications of publishing specific code, highlighting potential compliance or intellectual property issues.

Point 13. Use and contribute to open standards, common components and patterns

Service Standard summary: Point 13 emphasises the importance for service teams to utilise and contribute to open standards, common components, and patterns. This approach allows teams to leverage existing solutions, enhancing user experience and cost efficiency. Teams are encouraged to use standard government technology components, maximise technological flexibility through APIs and authoritative data sources, and share any new components or patterns they develop, such as by contributing to the GOV.UK Design System. Additionally, when creating potentially useful data, services should publish it in an open, machine-readable format under an Open Government Licence, ensuring sensitive or personal information is appropriately protected.

Existing AI tooling:

• AI Code Review and Refactoring Tools: Tools like GitHub Copilot or Amazon CodeWhisperer can help teams identify non-standard code and refactor it to align with open standards or existing component libraries.

• Automated Documentation Generation: AI tools like GitHub Copilot, Swimm, Mintlify, Documatic, and Codex can help government teams generate and maintain clear, up-to-date documentation for APIs, services, and components, improving transparency, reuse, and onboarding across departments.

• Design Pattern Recognition: AI can scan repositories and identify reusable UI or service patterns across services, helping teams understand where standard components are being used (or could be).

• Component Matching Tools: AI can suggest existing GOV.UK Design System components when a developer starts building something similar, reducing duplication and encouraging reuse.

• Open Data Quality Checks: AI can validate open data for formatting issues, accessibility, or privacy risks, ensuring it's published in compliant and useful formats.

Future AI innovations:

• AI-Driven Pattern Libraries: Imagine a tool that could automatically create and evolve a design/component library by learning from thousands of public services and interfaces across government.

• Conversational Component Builders: Voice/chat interfaces that could let developers or designers describe a need in plain English, and the AI returns a standard component or generates one, ready for review and inclusion.

• Predictive Contribution Suggestions: AI tools that could analyse what a team is working on and proactively suggest which components, standards, or patterns they could contribute back to central libraries, with boilerplate documentation and tests.

• AI Code Compliance Enforcement: Advanced AI linters that could not only point out code issues but teach the team how to align their work with government standards interactively, like a smart mentor.

• Semantic Data Publishing Assistants: Tools that help teams model, tag, and publish new datasets in machine-readable, standard-compliant formats, using semantic web technologies and natural language interfaces.

Point 14. Operate a reliable service

Service Standard summary: The GOV.UK Service Manual advises that online government services must be reliable, available, and responsive at all times. This involves maximising uptime, enabling frequent deployments without disruption, regularly testing in live-like environments, implementing robust monitoring and response plans, and addressing any organisational or contractual barriers to service reliability.

Existing AI tooling:

• Anomaly Detection and Alerting: AI models can monitor system metrics and logs in real-time to detect unusual patterns like latency spikes or error rates. Tools like Datadog Watchdog use machine learning to surface these anomalies automatically, helping teams act before users are impacted.

• Predictive Maintenance: By analysing historical performance data, AI can predict potential failures in infrastructure or applications. Platforms such as Amazon DevOps Guru and Azure Monitor leverage machine learning to forecast issues and recommend proactive fixes, reducing unplanned downtime.

• Automated Incident Triage: AI can automatically categorise and prioritise incidents, and even route them to the appropriate teams. PagerDuty’s Intelligent Triage uses machine learning to consolidate related alerts and assess severity, enabling faster, more accurate responses.

• Load Forecasting: Machine learning can predict traffic patterns based on usage history, helping systems scale resources dynamically. Google Cloud’s AI Forecasting tools support infrastructure teams in anticipating demand and adjusting capacity before bottlenecks occur.

• Intelligent Log Analysis: AI-powered tools can scan and summarise vast amounts of log data to highlight root causes and potential solutions. Platforms like Logz.io and Elastic’s machine learning features apply anomaly detection and natural language processing to make logs more actionable.

• Test Automation with AI: AI can improve software quality by generating and prioritising test cases based on real user behaviour. Tools like Testim and Mabl use machine learning to create adaptive, resilient automated tests that evolve alongside the application.

Future AI innovations:

• Self-Healing Systems: Services that could automatically detect, diagnose, and correct issues in real-time with minimal human intervention, like restarting components or rolling back code.

• Autonomous Release Pipelines: AI systems that could decide the safest deployment windows and run dynamic risk assessments, pausing or altering deployments if anomalies are predicted.

• AI-Driven UX Monitoring: Tools that could interpret user sentiment or behavioural cues to detect subtle experience degradation before technical metrics reflect an issue.

• Cognitive Load Prediction for Engineers - Future AI might help balance incident response load across teams, considering stress, alert fatigue, or previous workloads.

• Cross-Service Correlation Engines: AI could automatically correlate incidents across microservices or departments to pinpoint systemic failures more accurately and quickly.

• Proactive Compliance Monitoring: Smart systems could monitor changes in regulations and scan services to detect potential compliance issues before they impact service reliability.

Conclusion

Throughout this series, we’ve looked at how AI can support each of the 14 points in the UK Government Service Standard. From improving user research and simplifying journeys, to enhancing security and maintaining reliable infrastructure, AI is already beginning to transform how service teams operate.

We’ve explored how current tools, across disciplines, can reduce repetitive work, improve decision-making, and help teams focus on what matters most: delivering accessible, effective, and inclusive public services. We’ve also considered what might be possible in the near future, where AI acts as a co-pilot across design, delivery, operations, and beyond.

Crucially, we’ve acknowledged that AI is not a silver bullet. It must be applied thoughtfully, safely, and ethically. The UK Government’s AI Playbook provides a clear foundation for doing just that, giving teams the frameworks, training, and principles needed to explore AI without compromising public trust or accountability.

To further support implementation, the government has introduced a series of AI training courses through Civil Service Learning and Government Campus, developed in partnership with leading technology providers and the Government Skills unit. These learning resources are designed to equip civil servants with the confidence and expertise to apply AI effectively in their roles.

As AI capabilities mature, so too must our approach to delivery. The opportunity is not just to use AI for efficiency, but to use it as a force multiplier for a better, more human-centred government.

If you work on digital services in the public sector, now is the time to start evaluating where AI might make your work more focused, inclusive, or sustainable. Not by replacing expertise, but by extending it.

Thank you for following along with this series. I hope it has sparked ideas, opened questions, and helped you see AI as a practical and responsible enabler of better public service delivery. As always, I’d welcome your feedback and perspectives, especially as this space continues to evolve.

Open collaboration and ongoing dialogue will be essential as we navigate this emerging, AI-enhanced landscape together.

Contact information

If you have any questions about our AI initiatives, Software Engineering Service, or you want to find out more about other services we provide at Solirius Reply, please get in touch (opens in a new tab).